Bug 501225 - Different information in man page vs program help
Summary: Different information in man page vs program help
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: chkconfig
Version: 5.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: BaseOS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-18 05:58 UTC by Martin Kočí
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:18 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-02 12:15:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:1628 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE chkconfig bug fix update 2009-12-02 12:15:13 UTC

Description Martin Kočí 2009-05-18 05:58:09 UTC
Description of problem:
If you get chkconfig help you obtain info about level param like :
chkconfig [--level <levels>] <name> <on|off|reset|resetpriorities>
but in the man page is : 
chkconfig [--level levels] name <on|off|reset>

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run chkconfig without params or with --help parameter
2. run man page for chkconfig

  
Actual results:
Missing information about resetpriorities in the man page

Expected results:
No diff

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2009-05-18 19:14:41 UTC
This was fixed a long time ago in Fedora. I suppose at some point it could be in a RHEL update, but it doesn't really qualify for an update by itself.

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2009-11-02 19:27:39 UTC
Building as 1.3.30.2-1.el5.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2009-12-02 12:15:22 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1628.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.