Just FYI. The obscure "<PREFIX>" and "<PACKAGE>" syntax in CDL custom rules was introduced for Churchill (which did not use GNU make other than _within_ custom make rules). Recent eCos host tools should also accept "$(PREFIX)" and "$(REPOSITORY)/$(PACKAGE)". We should consider deprecating the "<PREFIX>" and "<PACKAGE>" syntax. [+update the documentation accordingly -Jesper] John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesper Skov" <jskov.com> Newsgroups: cygnus.project.ecc.target.changes To: <ecc-target-changes> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 7:53 AM Subject: work around se77x9 monitor problem > Index: cdl/hal_sh_sh77x9_se77x9.cdl > =================================================================== > RCS file: /local/cvsfiles/ecc/ecc/hal/sh/se77x9/current/cdl/hal_sh_sh77x9_se77x9.cdl,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -5 -r1.5 hal_sh_sh77x9_se77x9.cdl > --- cdl/hal_sh_sh77x9_se77x9.cdl 2001/06/28 10:59:47 1.5 > +++ cdl/hal_sh_sh77x9_se77x9.cdl 2001/07/27 06:52:11 > @@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ > > make -priority 325 { > <PREFIX>/bin/redboot.bin : <PREFIX>/bin/redboot.elf > $(OBJCOPY) --strip-debug $< $(@:.bin=.img) > $(OBJCOPY) -O srec $< $(@:.bin=.srec) > + $(OBJCOPY) --change-address 0x21000000 -O srec $< $(@:.bin=.eprom.srec) > $(OBJCOPY) -O binary $< $@ > } > } > } > }
Is it safe to just change these? If so, why not just do it in bulk?
This bug has moved to http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50147