Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The SSH library with -Full C library functions for manipulating a client-side SSH connection -Fully configurable sessions -Support for AES-128,AES-192,AES-256,blowfish, in cbc mode -use multiple SSH connections in a same process, at same time. -usable SFTP implementation -Public key and password authentication
What's the difference between this library and that one: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libssh2/ ?
*** Bug 503754 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The libssh has different API.
+ GOOD: rpmlint is silent on both source and binary package. + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + GOOD: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - GOOD: LICENSE file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 8a76c03579a3e27046e6bafe88ffd171 + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build is https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389496 + GOOD: builds on all architectures + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. (builds in koji) + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK + GOOD: not relocatable + GOOD: A package owns all directories that it creates. + GOOD: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package. + GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage. + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. APPROVED
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libssh Short Description: A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Owners: jfch2222 Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC:
*** Bug 503753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please note that branch names are "F-10" and "F-11". CVS done.
Build as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=104812
I'd like to see this in EPEL6. I can maintain it there if the current maintainer does not.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libssh New Branches: el6 Owners: slaanesh
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libssh New Branches: el5 Owners: slaanesh