Bug 509221 - multi-arch, listing packages shows, x86_64, installing packages shows AMD64
multi-arch, listing packages shows, x86_64, installing packages shows AMD64
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Brad Buckingham
wes hayutin
Depends On:
Blocks: 471789
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2009-07-01 15:35 EDT by wes hayutin
Modified: 2009-09-10 14:44 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: sat530
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-09-10 14:44:53 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description wes hayutin 2009-07-01 15:35:56 EDT
Description of problem:

build 5/26 rhel 5 

multi-arch, listing packages shows, x86_64, installing packages shows AMD64

1. register a rhel53 x86_64 boxl 
2. go to sdc, list packages
note the packages w/ x86_64

3. go to sdc, install packages
note RHEL5 packages w/ AMD64

go to a @base system x86_64, go to install page.
install zsh, notice that the arch is AMD64

install it, rhn_check

now use the webui to list the package.
The arch is now listed as x86_64

boog :)
Comment 1 Clifford Perry 2009-07-01 16:02:08 EDT
Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2009-07-01 16:39:10 EDT
master git commit: 6faa879a0a41ee68706d18c2de7e5ec0ce84c85c
vader git commit: e7e79d422c363f81508192e6acc6e0e2bb007f08

Looks like the problem was that the query used by the List/Remove page was using the rhnPackageArch.label and the Install page was rhnPackageArch.name.  For the 64-bit arch, these values are different.  Updated the Install page to use rhnPackageArch.label which is the more correct value.
Comment 3 John Sefler 2009-07-06 10:33:06 EDT
verifed 7/3 build
Comment 4 Brandon Perkins 2009-08-07 16:39:00 EDT
Release Pending.  All is x86_64 now.
Comment 5 Brandon Perkins 2009-09-10 14:44:53 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.