Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 510501
typo errors in man page for pamperspective
Last modified: 2016-05-31 21:37:51 EDT
After the fix, pamperspective man page still contains one invalid --include_frame option which should be --frame_include instead. Suggesting to fix this in the next netpbm package update. +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #483011 +++ Description of problem: There should be "--frame_include" instead of "--frame-include" in the man page ('_' vs. '-' problem). There should be "--frame_include" instead of "--include_frame" in the man page (different order). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): netpbm-progs-10.35-6.1.el5_2.2 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: $ man pamperspective | col -b | grep -- "--frame-include" --frame-include=no (overriding the default), you’ll need to specify $ man pamperspective | col -b | grep -- "--include_frame" by either margin options, --include_frame, or --include (or their $ pamperspective --frame-include unrecognized option `--frame-include' $ pamperspective --include_frame unrecognized option `--include_frame'
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0287.html