Bug 510742 - Upgrade doc for scenario 1a specifies "4AS" when choice could be RHEL 4 or RHEL 5
Summary: Upgrade doc for scenario 1a specifies "4AS" when choice could be RHEL 4 or RH...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Upgrades
Version: 530
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Milan Zázrivec
QA Contact: John Matthews
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 456986
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-07-10 14:55 UTC by John Matthews
Modified: 2009-08-27 17:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sat530
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-27 17:38:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description John Matthews 2009-07-10 14:55:42 UTC
Description of problem:

Add a short blurb stating that "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5" is a valid option to step #3 of "BASIC STEP SUMMARY" from rhn-satellite-5-upgrade-scenario-1a.txt
  
Step #3 from "BASIC STEP SUMMARY" (rhn-satellite-5-upgrade-scenario-1a.txt)

 3. Build a separate Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4AS.
    according to the specifications of the Red Hat Network Satellite Guide.


This is already corrected under "IN MORE DEPTH"

3. "Build a separate Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4AS or Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
   according to the specifications of the Red Hat Network Satellite Guide."


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -q rhn-upgrade
rhn-upgrade-5.3.0.16-1.el4sat

Comment 1 Milan Zázrivec 2009-07-13 10:28:25 UTC
satellite.git, SATELLITE-5.3: ed63c48c0382a35dacae1b0ac3f2dbc8cc8f5fae

Comment 2 Milan Zázrivec 2009-07-15 06:47:10 UTC
rhn-upgrade-5.3.0.17-1

Comment 3 John Matthews 2009-07-21 16:19:56 UTC
VERIFIED

# rpm -q rhn-upgrade
rhn-upgrade-5.3.0.20-1.el4sat

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2009-08-17 15:05:00 UTC
verified in stage

Comment 5 Brandon Perkins 2009-08-27 17:38:28 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1235.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.