Spec URL: http://www.open-sharedroot.org/development/comoonics-cluster-py/comoonics-cluster-py.spec SRPM URL: http://www.open-sharedroot.org/development/comoonics-cluster-py/comoonics-cluster-py-0-1-20-src.rpm/view Description: comoonics-cluster-py Python libraries for querying different cluster types. Examples are Red Hat Cluster, Oracle Cluster and NFS-Sharedroot clusters based on Red Hat Cluster configuration. This library is used to introduce and abstraction layer for querying different clustertypes. This library is required for the open-sharedroot feature: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Opensharedroot It depends on comoonics-base-py. See bugzilla . This is my first package. Therefore I need a sponsor. Thanks !!
I'll take this.
Find updated rpms as descibed in comoonics-base-py bug (#511276) here: http://www.open-sharedroot.org/development/comoonics-cluster-py/comoonics-cluster-py.spec http://www.open-sharedroot.org/development/comoonics-cluster-py/comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-21.src.rpm http://www.open-sharedroot.org/development/comoonics-cluster-py/comoonics-cluster-py-0.1.tar.gz http://www.open-sharedroot.org/development/comoonics-cluster-py/comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-21.noarch.rpm The text/file content type for *.spec files will be changed in the following days. Regards and let me know what you think Marc.
Items marked "GOOD" or "PASS" fulfil the guidelines or they don't apply to this package. Items marked "CHECK" aren't covered by the guidelines but you should check and fix them anyway in my opinion. Items marked "BAD" violate the guidelines in some point and need to be fixed. - GOOD: rpmlint run on doesn't flag errors/warnings - GOOD: package name according to guidelines - GOOD: spec file named properly - GOOD: package meets packaging guidelines - GOOD: licensed according to licensing guidelines - GOOD: license in spec file matches license in package - GOOD: license shipped as documentation - GOOD: the spec file is written in American English - GOOD: the spec file is legible - GOOD: sources used to build the package match upstream source --> remember to bump the version if you make changes to the tarball (from now on at least) - GOOD: builds in mock for x86_64/Rawhide - GOOD: all build dependencies listed - PASS: doesn't ship locale files - PASS: no libraries shipped - GOOD: package is not relocatable - GOOD: all shipped directories owned by package, direct dependency or filesystem - GOOD: no duplicates in %files - GOOD: permissions on files are set properly - GOOD: package has a %clean section - GOOD: package uses macros consistently - GOOD: the package contains code, not content - PASS: no large documentation files - GOOD: %doc doesn't affect runtime - PASS: no header files - PASS: no static libraries - PASS: no pkgconfig files - PASS: no libraries included - PASS: no devel package - GOOD: no *.la libtool archives - PASS: no desktop file - GOOD: doesn't own files or directories owned by other packages - GOOD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install - GOOD: all file names are valid UTF-8 This package is APPROVED.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: comoonics-cluster-py Short Description: Comoonics cluster configuration utilities written in Python Owners: Marc Grimme Mark Hlawatschek Branches: devel InitialCC:
Unfortunately the owners need to be FAS account names, not your actual real names. Could you make a revised request?
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: comoonics-cluster-py Short Description: Comoonics cluster configuration utilities written in Python Owners: elcody02 markhla Branches: devel InitialCC:
CVS done.