Bug 515307 - ATLAS doesn't build sse packages under Rawhide
Summary: ATLAS doesn't build sse packages under Rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: atlas
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Deji Akingunola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-08-03 16:43 UTC by Mark Chappell
Modified: 2009-08-04 14:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-04 13:44:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mark Chappell 2009-08-03 16:43:53 UTC
Building ATLAS on an EL5 derivative and noticed a few oddities with the package:

FC12 has moved to i686, meaning that the hardcoded i586 for SSE packages doesn't get built.  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=116298

Is hard coding x86 build arches really the best way to go? What's wrong with the ix86 macro?

Also, not building SSE for x86_64 feels "wrong"

Could alternatives be a nice way to select just one blas implementation (including the atlas-sse variations)?  

The include files should probably also be "touched" to set the datestamp to a known value and allow RPM to ignore the "conflict" on multiarch platforms.  


Mark

Comment 1 Deji Akingunola 2009-08-04 13:44:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Building ATLAS on an EL5 derivative and noticed a few oddities with the
> package:
> 
> FC12 has moved to i686, meaning that the hardcoded i586 for SSE packages
> doesn't get built.  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=116298
>
Known issue, fixed build will appear in rawhide shortly.
 
> Is hard coding x86 build arches really the best way to go? What's wrong with
> the ix86 macro?
> 
> Also, not building SSE for x86_64 feels "wrong"
>
For now, we build atlas (on Fedora) for x86_64 arch with the least common denominator of sse instruction set (sse3) on all x86_64 cpus.

> Could alternatives be a nice way to select just one blas implementation
> (including the atlas-sse variations)?  
> 
What problem would it be solving?

Comment 2 Mark Chappell 2009-08-04 14:14:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Also, not building SSE for x86_64 feels "wrong"
> >
> For now, we build atlas (on Fedora) for x86_64 arch with the least common
> denominator of sse instruction set (sse3) on all x86_64 cpus.

Must have missed that bit, sorry.

> > Could alternatives be a nice way to select just one blas implementation
> > (including the atlas-sse variations)?  
> > 
> What problem would it be solving?  

Just wondering out loud if there's a nice way to set atlas/goto/netlib as the "default" blas/lapack for a machine, for things like Macaulay2 and numpy.  Since atlas implements a standard (blas) API, it would however mean repacking the atlas libs to create a libblas.so


Mark


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.