Description of problem: The anthy-9100h-5.fc11 update release (FEDORA-2009-7675) does not install on x86_64. The i586 and x86_64 packages conflict by having different dictionary files /usr/share/anthy/anthy.dic Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anthy-9100h-5.fc11 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum update anthy on a x86_64 machine Actual results: File downloads, rpm attempts install, and then Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/anthy/anthy.dic conflicts between attempted installs of anthy-9100h-5.fc11.x86_64 and anthy-9100h-5.fc11.i586 Expected results: anthy update should install. Additional info: Diff'ing the build logs (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/anthy/9100h/5.fc11/data/logs/x86_64/ and http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/anthy/9100h/5.fc11/data/logs/i586/) makes it clear that different dictionary files were generated. The dictionary files are generated during compilation.
Out of curiousity why do you need anthy to be multilib?
I don't think I need it to be, or that anyone else particularly does. But if so, why is the i586 package in the x86_64 repository? That's not the case for most packages that don't need to be multilib. The i586 package was installed by default along with the x86_64 package when F11 was installed.
Fixed in anthy-9100h-7.fc{10,11,12}.
anthy-9100h-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anthy-9100h-7.fc11
anthy-9100h-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anthy-9100h-7.fc10
anthy-9100h-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
anthy-9100h-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.