Bug 517675 - Need a new Thunderbird-Lightning RPM with Thunderbird 3.0b3
Summary: Need a new Thunderbird-Lightning RPM with Thunderbird 3.0b3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sunbird
Version: 11
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lubomir Rintel
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 502496 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-08-15 23:01 UTC by Kevin J. Cummings
Modified: 2018-04-11 17:15 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-17 11:15:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot of thunderbird 3.0b3 (29.87 KB, image/png)
2009-08-17 10:55 UTC, Paolo Bonzini
no flags Details

Description Kevin J. Cummings 2009-08-15 23:01:26 UTC
Description of problem:

Thunderbird-lightning doesn't work with the new thunderbird Beta 3 that was just released.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.3.20090302hg.fc11

How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. update thunderbird
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Lightning doesn't work anymore

Expected results:
Lightning works.


Additional info:
The old thunderbird-lightning has both a min and max version of 3.0b2.  We need a new one for 3.0b3....

Comment 1 morgan read 2009-08-16 00:26:41 UTC
Hmm, yup - would have thought 3.0b3 would have been tested against current lightning...

Comment 2 udo 2009-08-16 16:00:51 UTC
I can't use the existing data in my calender without the updated rpm.
Thus I change the priority.
Why aren't thunderbird et al built together?

Comment 3 Paolo Bonzini 2009-08-17 08:28:25 UTC
For the record, you cannot do

 sudo yum erase thunderbird
 sudo yum install thunderbird-3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11.x86_64 thunderbird-lightning

It breaks thunderbird.

Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2009-08-17 10:25:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I can't use the existing data in my calender without the updated rpm.
> Thus I change the priority.
> Why aren't thunderbird et al built together?  

Because sunbird (and thunderbird-lightning) are not provided by Red Hat employees but by community and sometimes coordination doesn't work best.

Comment 5 Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-17 10:41:30 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I can't use the existing data in my calender without the updated rpm.
> > Thus I change the priority.
> > Why aren't thunderbird et al built together?  
> 
> Because sunbird (and thunderbird-lightning) are not provided by Red Hat
> employees but by community and sometimes coordination doesn't work best.  

No. It's

1.) because only Sunbird maintainer gets repoclosure e-mails, since it's its dependencies that broke, not Thunderbird, despite Thunderbird update broke the dependencies.

2.) The push scripts don't enforce that dependencies of updates are O.K.

Therefore the Thunderbird maintainer is is not aware that he shouldn't push the update until the dependencies are fixed, the update system won't stop him. And I'm sometimes too slow to react, especially when the update is for a security issue and goes quickly directly into stable.

However, the sunbird update was done a couple of days ago, closing this.

Comment 6 Paolo Bonzini 2009-08-17 10:55:55 UTC
Created attachment 357629 [details]
screenshot of thunderbird 3.0b3

I suppose the sunbird component is because there is no thunderbird-lightning component in the list.  Lightning does not work.

Comment 7 Paolo Bonzini 2009-08-17 10:56:16 UTC
Reopening.

Comment 8 Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-17 11:15:34 UTC
Paolo: This is fixed in 0.5.20090302hg.fc11, you presumably have an older revision. You either need to wait for an update or grab it from the build system (koji).

Comment 9 Matěj Cepl 2009-08-17 11:18:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> I suppose the sunbird component is because there is no thunderbird-lightning
> component in the list.  Lightning does not work.  

thunderbird-lightning is a binary subpackage of sunbird package. Try

rpm -qi thunderbird-lightning

and look at SourceRPM field.

Comment 10 oll 2009-08-17 11:22:39 UTC
I perfectly guess you can't check every extension before committing a new
release of thunderbird, but lightning is becoming more and more a crucial
component of thunderbird in professional environment  (especially since it
works well with outlook meeting requests).
I did a fresh "yum clean all && yum update thunderbird-lightning" but no new release is available 
Anyway, injecting manually the latest Lightning nightly build form Mozilla website seems to work for my users but an updated packages would be even greater ;)

Comment 11 Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-17 11:31:26 UTC
*** Bug 502496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-17 11:37:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> I perfectly guess you can't check every extension before committing a new
> release of thunderbird, but lightning is becoming more and more a crucial
> component of thunderbird in professional environment  (especially since it
> works well with outlook meeting requests).

Well, it actually is possible. I was wrong claiming that thunderbird maintainer
don't get mails for broken dependencies, nor that there was a broken
dependency. In fact, the dependencies were done wrong in F11 (unlike rawhide)
therefore there was not problem detected during repoclosure. Which means that
scripts will detect such breakages in future and both maintainers of
thunderbird and sunbird will be notified, so that incompatibilities can be
avoided.

> I did a fresh "yum clean all && yum update thunderbird-lightning" but no new
> release is available 
> Anyway, injecting manually the latest Lightning nightly build form Mozilla
> website seems to work for my users but an updated packages would be even
> greater ;)

There _is_ an update. Please read the bug before following up.

For everyone that will run into this problem:

There's an update created in the update system [1]. All we can do a this point
is wait for it to get pushed. You can get the packages directly from the build
system if you are in urge [2].

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sunbird-1.0-0.5.20090715hg.fc11
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=127385

Comment 13 morgan read 2009-08-17 11:46:13 UTC
I detect a fair gnashing of teeth - thanks everyone for getting this out asap.

Here's a direct link to the i586 package:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sunbird/1.0/0.5.20090715hg.fc11/i586/thunderbird-lightning-1.0-0.5.20090715hg.fc11.i586.rpm

Comment 14 udo 2009-08-17 13:19:18 UTC
1.0.0.5?
1.0.0.8 fc12 here and it doesn't work.
Could you build the latest?

1.0.0.5 does let the calendar appear again on x96_64. thanks.

Comment 15 Kevin J. Cummings 2009-08-17 20:10:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> I detect a fair gnashing of teeth - thanks everyone for getting this out asap.
> 
> Here's a direct link to the i586 package:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sunbird/1.0/0.5.20090715hg.fc11/i586/thunderbird-lightning-1.0-0.5.20090715hg.fc11.i586.rpm  

And the x86_64 package can be found here....

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sunbird/1.0/0.5.20090715hg.fc11/x86_64/thunderbird-lightning-1.0-0.5.20090715hg.fc11.x86_64.rpm


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.