Description of Problem: Sndconfig fails when configuring a Creative Labs SoundBlaster AWE64 ISA sound card with the following errors. /lib/modules/2.4.7-0.8/kernel/drivers/sound/sb.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.7-0.8/kernel/drivers/sound/sb.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.7-0.8/kernel/drivers/sound/sb.o failed /lib/modules/2.4.7-0.8/kernel/drivers/sound/sb.o: insmod sound-slot-0 failed This appears to be the same issue as with bug ids 35052 and 36722 for RH 7.1. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run sndconfig with an isa sb awe64 installed in the machine 2. /sbin/modprobe sb --> with an isa sb awe64 installed in the machine
Assigning to kernel.
What does /proc/isapnp say?
Here is the output from /proc/isapnp Card 1 'CTL00e9:Creative SB AWE64 PnP' PnP version 1.0 Product version 1.0 Logical device 0 'CTL0045:Audio' Device is not active Resources 0 Priority preferred Port 0x220-0x220, align 0x0, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x330-0x330, align 0x0, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x388-0x3f8, align 0x0, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5 High-Edge DMA 1 8-bit byte-count compatible DMA 5 16-bit word-count compatible Alternate resources 0:1 Priority acceptable Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x300-0x330, align 0x2f, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x388-0x3f8, align 0x0, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible DMA 5,6,7 16-bit word-count compatible Alternate resources 0:2 Priority acceptable Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x300-0x330, align 0x2f, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible DMA 5,6,7 16-bit word-count compatible Alternate resources 0:3 Priority acceptable Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible DMA 5,6,7 16-bit word-count compatible Alternate resources 0:4 Priority acceptable Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x300-0x330, align 0x2f, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x388-0x3f8, align 0x0, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible Alternate resources 0:5 Priority acceptable Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x300-0x330, align 0x2f, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible Alternate resources 0:6 Priority acceptable Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible Alternate resources 0:7 Priority functional Port 0x220-0x280, align 0x1f, size 0x10, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x300-0x330, align 0xf, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding Port 0x388-0x394, align 0x3, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding IRQ 5,7,2/9,10 High-Edge DMA 0,1,3 8-bit byte-count compatible DMA 5,6,7 16-bit word-count compatible Logical device 1 'CTL7002:Game' Compatible device PNPb02f Device is not active Resources 0 Priority preferred Port 0x200-0x200, align 0x0, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding Alternate resources 0:1 Priority acceptable Port 0x200-0x208, align 0x7, size 0x8, 16-bit address decoding Logical device 2 'CTL0022:WaveTable' Device is not active Resources 0 Priority preferred Port 0x620-0x620, align 0x0, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding Port 0xa20-0xa20, align 0x0, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding Port 0xe20-0xe20, align 0x0, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding Alternate resources 0:1 Priority acceptable Port 0x620-0x680, align 0x1f, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding Port 0xa20-0xa80, align 0x1f, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding Port 0xe20-0xe80, align 0x1f, size 0x4, 16-bit address decoding
We (Red Hat) should really try to fix this before next release.
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem persists. The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/