Bug 525287 - Pentium is said to be supported, but the build is for i686
Summary: Pentium is said to be supported, but the build is for i686
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora Documentation
Classification: Fedora
Component: release-notes
Version: devel
Hardware: i586
OS: Linux
low
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: John J. McDonough
QA Contact: Karsten Wade
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-09-23 19:48 UTC by Göran Uddeborg
Modified: 2009-10-27 14:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-27 14:53:50 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Göran Uddeborg 2009-09-23 19:48:21 UTC
The release notes for F12, at least the Swedish PO file I'm currently translating, has a message

#. Tag: para
#: HardwareOverview.xml:65
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"The following CPU specifications are stated in terms of Intel processors. "
"Other processors, such as those from AMD, Cyrix, and VIA that are compatible "
"with and equivalent to the following Intel processors, may also be used with "
"Fedora. Fedora &PRODVER; requires an Intel Pentium or better processor, and "
"is optimized for Pentium 4 and later processors."

But rawhide is built for i686, which I thought translated to Pentium 4.  So I didn't think a "plain" Pentium was supported any longer.

Have I confused the meaning of these i?86 numbers, or is it a bug in the release notes?

Comment 1 Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-23 20:08:54 UTC
Yes, it's a mistake -- thanks for the catch! It's not quite as bad as that, however:

P5 (i586) was the original Pentium microarchitecture; Intel introduced P6 (i686) in 1995 as the Pentium Pro and continued it in the Pentium II and Pentium III.

The Pentium 4 was based on the NetBurst architecture that followed P6. 

Strictly, then, we should say "requires an Intel Pentium Pro or better processor". I'll make sure this gets fixed when we next regenerate the POT files.

Comment 2 Göran Uddeborg 2009-09-23 20:13:00 UTC
So it wasn't me OR the release notes.  We were BOTH wrong. :-)

Comment 3 John J. McDonough 2009-10-27 14:53:50 UTC
Pentium Pro requirement noted in the GA release notes.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.