Bug 529521 - [gu_IN] OO showing Square box instead of Number in GUI, Input is ok
Summary: [gu_IN] OO showing Square box instead of Number in GUI, Input is ok
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 529637
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-10-18 03:04 UTC by A S Alam
Modified: 2013-07-03 00:55 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 530946 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-30 10:39:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
gu_IN Interface (45.98 KB, image/png)
2009-10-18 03:04 UTC, A S Alam 		no flags Details
View All

Description A S Alam 2009-10-18 03:04:18 UTC 
Created attachment 365148 [details]
gu_IN Interface

Description of problem:
Openoffice is showing Square (White) Box instead of oowriter in GUI (translated Interface),
while input (in Text area Numbers are ok

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org-core-3.1.1-19.11.fc12.x86_64
libicu-4.2.1-6.fc12.x86_64
lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. fresh installed Gujarati desktop
2. run oowriter (while login in gu_IN Desktop)
3.
  
Actual results:
Number (font size, scale numbers) are square box)

Expected results:
should appear as 1,2,3 etc

Additional info:
Screenshot attached
Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2009-10-18 19:29:05 UTC 
Confirmed. Rather odd to my eyes that when I ask fontconfig for "a font like Lohit Gujarati that has '1' in it (Lohit Gujarati doesn't have numbers) that I get back "Lohit Gujarati", which doesn't have those glyphs. grr...

I'll make a test-case and ask behdad if we're doing this the wrong way or what the story there is.
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2009-10-19 09:22:48 UTC 
I can alleviate the symptoms a bit and remove the obvious cases, but the fundamental issue will remain. See bug 529637 for the underlying problem.
Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2009-10-30 10:39:46 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 529637 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.