abrt detected a crash. Attached file: backtrace cmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py component: policycoreutils executable: /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 package: policycoreutils-gui-2.0.74-17.fc12 uuid: 312beb6b
Created attachment 373422 [details] File: backtrace
Is selinux disabled on this box?
(In reply to comment #2) > Is selinux disabled on this box? yes!
Is selinux-policy-targeted installed? What does the contents of /etc/selinux look like? ls -l /etc/selinux
(In reply to comment #4) > Is selinux-policy-targeted installed? > > What does the contents of /etc/selinux > > look like? > > ls -l /etc/selinux ok... checked selinux and found in /etc/selinux/config: "SELINUX=disable" instead of "disabled" Disabling SELinux didn't work (even after fixing the file) with "setenforce 0" -> reboot -> selinux is now disabled! The GUI now works, but I'm still getting: /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py:71: Warning: IA__g_object_get_valist: object class `GnomeProgram' has no property named `default-icon' xml = gtk.glade.XML ("/usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.glade", domain=PROGNAME) Cheers
Yes that is an ancient glade/gnome bug. Not specific to selinux management gui. So how do I convince you to enable selinux :^). Gui should have been able to handle this mislabel. and just put up an error message.
(In reply to comment #6) > Yes that is an ancient glade/gnome bug. Not specific to selinux management > gui. > > So how do I convince you to enable selinux :^). > > Gui should have been able to handle this mislabel. and just put up an error > message. hehe ... good luck with that... will look into it as soon as i have some spare time! ... anyway thx for the really fast response! cheers T
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.