Bug 544532 - Visual indication (transparency) for cut icons.
Summary: Visual indication (transparency) for cut icons.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus
Version: 12
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-12-05 09:00 UTC by udo
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-25 18:04:29 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description udo 2009-12-05 09:00:00 UTC
Description of problem: Visual indication (transparency) for cut icons is a basic GUI functionality which is still lacking


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nautilus-2.28.2-1.fc12.x86_64

How reproducible:
Install gnome/Fedora

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install gnome/Fedora
2. start nautilus
3. 'cut' a file
  
Actual results:
no indication visible that file was 'cut'

Expected results:
indication visible that file was 'cut', see e.g. the redmond products, other guis

Additional info:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47948

Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2009-12-06 23:11:16 UTC
Feature requests like this are much better tracked upstream.
As you noticed, there is already an upstream request for this.

Comment 2 udo 2009-12-07 03:50:44 UTC
Which is already taking 8 years and essential enough for some pressure by Redhat.

Comment 3 udo 2009-12-07 14:25:12 UTC
Maybe Redhat can propose asmall patch and finally get this work done for this VERY BASIC gui functionality.

Comment 4 udo 2010-01-24 17:06:44 UTC
What is Redhat willing to do to fix this very basic and relatively simple gui issue? It has been going on for way too long.

Comment 5 Tomáš Bžatek 2010-01-25 15:38:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> What is Redhat willing to do to fix this very basic and relatively simple gui
> issue? It has been going on for way too long.    
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47948#c14

We're watching upstream bugzillas, no need to discuss it here. Once it's implemented, I'd be happy to backport it in Fedora.

Comment 6 udo 2010-01-25 15:41:11 UTC
Erhm.. I didn't mean the (passively) watching upstream, I meant some active approach since the upstream bug has been sooo old and appears to have no priority because of it's lack of glamour factor. It is a very necessary basic feature, though.
So please reconsider what you can do.
Maybe a GSOC idea?

Comment 7 udo 2010-01-25 15:42:03 UTC
Closing this bug will not help the issue in any way.
Or did you imply that RH has no leverage?

Comment 8 Matthias Clasen 2010-01-25 18:04:29 UTC
We are not obliged to 'help the issue' in any way. 
If you care deeply about this, engage upstream to get this implemented.

Comment 9 udo 2010-01-25 18:20:38 UTC
Who mentions obligations?

If you don't want to improve products you ship not much will happen in certain cases like this one.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.