Bug 55526 - w3c-libwww has bad rpaths
w3c-libwww has bad rpaths
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: w3c-libwww (Show other bugs)
7.3
ia64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Harald Hoyer
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2001-11-01 12:01 EST by Tim Powers
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-03-10 10:25:43 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tim Powers 2001-11-01 12:01:07 EST
++++++++++ w3c-libwww-apps-5.2.8-10.ia64.rpm ++++++++++
E: w3c-libwww-apps binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/w3c
['/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/Library/src/.libs',
'/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/modules/expat/xmlparse/.libs',
'/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/modules/expat/xmltok/.libs',
'/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/modules/md5/.libs']
E: w3c-libwww-apps binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/webbot
['/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/Library/src/.libs',
'/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/modules/expat/xmlparse/.libs',
'/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/modules/expat/xmltok/.libs',
'/usr/src/build/37123-ia64/BUILD/w3c-libwww-5.2.8/modules/md5/.libs']
Comment 1 Harald Hoyer 2001-12-13 09:42:12 EST
?????

bash-2.05$ rpmlint 
/mnt/md1/redhat/beehive/comps/dist/7.2/w3c-libwww/5.2.8-10/ia64/w3c-libwww-apps-5.2.8-10.ia64.rpm
W: w3c-libwww-apps invalid-license W3C (see: 
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software.html)
Comment 2 Tim Powers 2001-12-13 11:33:11 EST
This is wierd. It no longer shows up when rpmlint is run on it, but the paths
are there if you check the strings in the two apps. The problem isn't that it
defines an rpath, it's that it defines an rpath from the buildroot on the
buildmachine.

Tim
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2003-01-02 14:44:39 EST
Looks like this shouldn't be marked as MODIFIED.  Changing to ASSIGNED.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.