Hi there, Would you mind updating protobuf to the latest version? The 2.3.0 version includes some major improvements in the speed of the Python bindings.
Linked below is an updated SRPM with the following changes: - Version 2.3.0 - Re-enabled Java support - Modified to work with epel 5 (no Java support) Source: http://github.com/silas/rpms/tree/master/protobuf/ SRPM: http://github.com/downloads/silas/rpms/protobuf-2.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm I tested compiling this on Rawhide, Fedora 12 and EPEL 5.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
*Bump*. Consider this the start of the non-responsive maintainer process (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers).
Sorry, was away from internet for some time. I'm glad if someone want so comaintain this package.
No worries -- I'll bump it to 2.3.0 now, if that's ok with you.
Thats just fine. I'm just finished reviewing specs by Silas Sewell, and everything looks good to me.
It's built in devel[0] -- I'll build it for F-13 and F-12 now and push to updates-testing. [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=171479
Thanks a lot! I appreciate it very much.
No problem :)
(In reply to comment #7) > It's built in devel[0] -- I'll build it for F-13 and F-12 now and push to > updates-testing. > > [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=171479 WTF, it's a bit late for F13. You will have to make sure all packages build against it i.e libcompizconfig before pushing it .
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #7) > > It's built in devel[0] -- I'll build it for F-13 and F-12 now and push to > > updates-testing. > > > > [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=171479 > > WTF, it's a bit late for F13. > You will have to make sure all packages build against it i.e libcompizconfig > before pushing it . Let's tune down the drama factor a bit, ok? It's not going to break existing built packages, and updates-testing exists for a reason. This is how Fedora releases work -- we test updates before pushing them, but we do push feature updates.
(In reply to comment #11) > Let's tune down the drama factor a bit, ok? It's not going to break existing > built packages Sorry if I was OTT but it has done so in the past :( I have just checked libcompizconfig with the new protobuf package and there are no build issues. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2163710 Can you request buildroot overrides for the new protobuf versions in F12 and F13 so I can coordinate with you?
Sure -- https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3705 .