Rpmlint identifies the PTFL as an invalid license, but it is listed as a Fedora good license : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Fonts/ParaType_Font_License Could it be added to the list of good licenses that rpmlint knows?
Yes, it seems that a number of font licenses including PTFL have fallen through the cracks when rpmlint's list of licenses have been synced with Wiki. Will fix in the next package revision.
rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13
rpmlint-0.95-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmlint-0.95-2.fc12
rpmlint-0.95-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
rpmlint-0.95-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.