Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 57246 - xemacs RHSA-2001:010-07 conflict w/ original version
xemacs RHSA-2001:010-07 conflict w/ original version
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: xemacs (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jens Petersen
Aaron Brown
: Security
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2001-12-07 15:12 EST by Ben Levenson
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:38 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2001-12-12 20:27:29 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ben Levenson 2001-12-07 15:12:04 EST
Description of Problem:
please supply an errata for the xemacs RPMS.
The following conflict occurs when I try to apply the RPMS from

file /usr/lib/xemacs/mule-packages/etc/mule-doc/INSTALL from install of
xemacs-21.1.14-2.7 conflicts with file from package xemacs-sumo-20000524-1j2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
original: xemacs-21.1.12-3j3
errata:   xemacs-21.1.14-2.7
Comment 1 Glen Foster 2001-12-07 15:15:07 EST
Good catch, Ben.
Comment 2 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2001-12-07 15:19:02 EST
This sounds like something done out of Japan - reassigning.
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2001-12-09 21:13:27 EST
I don't think there is any real conflict.  The new xemacs package should
obsolete the Japanese xemacs-sumo package that is all, since it is included in
the main xemacs package.  If you remove xemacs-sumo before installing the errata
there shouldn't be any problem.
Comment 4 Ben Levenson 2001-12-12 19:14:03 EST
From xemacs-21.1.14-2.7.src.rpm:
  Obsoletes: xemacs-extras xemacs-packages-el xemacs-packages xemacs-noX \   
  xemacs-X11 xemacs-mule xemacs-static 

Should xemacs-sumo and xemacs-sumo-el be added to this list?
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2001-12-12 20:27:23 EST
Yes, that's right.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.