Bug 591977 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12: get_c_method: Process /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12: get_c_method: Process /u...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 547550
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server (Show other bugs)
12
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Matthew Barnes
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:c31dc534f81832f75ccc20f4421...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-13 11:23 EDT by Benjamin Kahn
Modified: 2010-05-25 05:36 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 05:36:31 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (43.24 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-13 11:23 EDT, Benjamin Kahn
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Benjamin Kahn 2010-05-13 11:23:28 EDT
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_DataServer_InterfaceCheck --oaf-ior-fd=34
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: get_c_method
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28
global_uuid: c31dc534f81832f75ccc20f4421bfcc8dd1be64b
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1.Sent an email, crash while in address lookup
2.
3.
Comment 1 Benjamin Kahn 2010-05-13 11:23:30 EDT
Created attachment 413794 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:36:31 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 547550 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:36:31 EDT
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #547550.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.