Bug 592293 - [abrt] crash in epiphany-2.28.2-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/epiphany was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in epiphany-2.28.2-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/epiphany was ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 592639
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: epiphany
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gecko Maintainer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1041fedfe81e51c585d2dfdb380...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-05-14 13:39 UTC by bugzillaredhat
Modified: 2010-05-25 09:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:30:05 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (40.50 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-14 13:39 UTC, bugzillaredhat
no flags Details

Description bugzillaredhat 2010-05-14 13:39:52 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: epiphany
comment: On one system Epiphany just core dumps without warning, on the machine reporting this I was fortunate enough to receive th e above error.  I investigated and noticed that /bin/java did not exist, so as a quick fix:  'sudo ln -s /etc/alternatives/java /bin/java' and I no longer receive the error or crash.
component: epiphany
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/epiphany
global_uuid: 1041fedfe81e51c585d2dfdb38032bff1a56dc6a
package: epiphany-2.28.2-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/epiphany was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
1. upgrade to java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1:
2. start epiphany and go to a website that requires java
3. core dump and/or "icedteanp plugin error: Failed to run /etc/alternatives/../../bin/java. For more information run "firefox -g" in a terminal window."

Comment 1 bugzillaredhat 2010-05-14 13:39:53 UTC
Created attachment 414050 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:30:05 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 592639 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:30:05 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #592639.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.