Bug 592366 - [abrt] crash in evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12: g_hash_table_lookup_node: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12: g_hash_table_lookup_node: P...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 577361
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-exchange
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:9d62e7d144c482cd81ec1abb9c7...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-05-14 16:26 UTC by generalmills3808
Modified: 2010-05-25 09:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:02:32 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (21.29 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-14 16:26 UTC, generalmills3808
no flags Details

Description generalmills3808 2010-05-14 16:26:18 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Exchange_Component_Factory:2.28 --oaf-ior-fd=33
component: evolution-exchange
crash_function: g_hash_table_lookup_node
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage
global_uuid: 9d62e7d144c482cd81ec1abb9c723e73d2df7264
package: evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

It's semi random when evolution will have a packet crash.  I have been using evolution in an exchange environmnet for over a year now, and only untill a month ago have these crashes surfaced.  

How to reproduce
1.  Open evolution 
2.  Start reading e-mail as normally
3.  Eventually evolution will have a packet crash

Comment 1 generalmills3808 2010-05-14 16:26:19 UTC
Created attachment 414105 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:02:32 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 577361 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:02:32 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #577361.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.