597210 – Multiple entitlement Subscribe process got terminated at the point of already subscribed pool.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 597210 - Multiple entitlement Subscribe process got terminated at the point of already subscribed pool.

Summary: Multiple entitlement Subscribe process got terminated at the point of already...

Keywords:
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA
Alias:	None
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	subscription-manager
Sub Component:
Version:	6.1
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Priority:	medium
Severity:	medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assignee:	Bryan Kearney
QA Contact:	wes hayutin
Docs Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:	568421
TreeView+	depends on / blocked

Reported:	2010-05-28 11:47 UTC by spandey
Modified:	2015-04-23 23:56 UTC (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 13:37:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)

Links
System	ID	Private	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHEA-2011:0611	0	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	new package: subscription-manager	2011-05-18 17:56:21 UTC

Description spandey 2010-05-28 11:47:44 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Prerequisites : 
Candlepin :sachtest.usersys.redhat.com
Client : Rhel6 client with SM version 60

Steps to Repro : 
1)Login to client console with valid credentials
2)subscribe for entitlement pool id 3 
3)execute following command on console 
subscription-manager-cli subscribe –pool=1 –pool=2 –pool=3 –pool=4 –pool=5

Expected Result : 
Client should subscribe for pool id : 1,2,4,5

Actual Result : 
Msg displayed already subscribe for pool id “3” 
Client not subscribed for pool id 4, 5


Note : If this defect is not assigned to correct owner please assign it to correct owner

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2010-06-07 16:02:29 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.

Comment 5 wes hayutin 2010-07-22 18:40:56 UTC

QE's suggestion is to raise an error that addresses each attempted pool id.
For example:

OLD ERROR:
Msg displayed already subscribe for pool id “3” 
Client not subscribed for pool id 4, 5

NEW ERROR:
Already subscribed to productID that matches pool 3
Already subscribed to productID that matches pool 4
Already subscribed to productID that matches pool 5

Comment 6 Ajay Kumar Nadathur Sreenivasan 2010-08-17 19:40:15 UTC

Developer Comment:
----------------- 

The change has been incorporated. The following shows the output when user tries to subscribe to pool [645,643, 644] all of which he is already subscribed to.

[ajay@localhost src{master}]$ sudo ./subscription-manager-cli subscribe --pool=645 --pool=643 --pool=644
This consumer is already subscribed to the product matching pool with id '645'
This consumer is already subscribed to the product matching pool with id '643'
This consumer is already subscribed to the product matching pool with id '644'


sha: 839f4b495d62f744578d33217d549cf83257d285

Comment 7 spandey 2010-09-08 16:25:43 UTC

Verified On following setup 


Candlepin : on-premises 
Client : Rhel6 with sm version 76 

[root@sachrhel6 ~]# subscription-manager-cli list --available | grep Pool
PoolId:            	1                        
PoolId:            	2                        
PoolId:            	3                        
PoolId:            	5                        
PoolId:            	6                        
PoolId:            	7                        
PoolId:            	8                        
PoolId:            	10                       
PoolId:            	11                       
[root@sachrhel6 ~]# subscription-manager-cli subscribe --pool=2
[root@sachrhel6 ~]# ls /etc/pki/entitlement/product/
3.pem
[root@sachrhel6 ~]# subscription-manager-cli subscribe --pool=1 --pool=2 --pool=3 --pool=5
This consumer is already subscribed to the product matching pool with id '2'
[root@sachrhel6 ~]# ls /etc/pki/entitlement/product/
3.pem  4.pem  5.pem  6.pem

Working fine 
Moving defect status from Modified to Verified

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:37:06 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0611.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.