Bug 598113 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
[abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libe...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 595062
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server (Show other bugs)
13
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Matthew Barnes
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:73ae171eddcb74e7afeb19c78cc...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-31 09:21 EDT by Oded Arbel
Modified: 2010-11-09 08:31 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 08:31:23 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (24.96 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-31 09:21 EDT, Oded Arbel
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Oded Arbel 2010-05-31 09:21:28 EDT
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
global_uuid: 73ae171eddcb74e7afeb19c78cc87d27452ace17
kernel: 2.6.33.5-112.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
How to reproduce: address book crashed while replying to an existing email.
Comment 1 Oded Arbel 2010-05-31 09:21:31 EDT
Created attachment 418294 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 08:31:23 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 595062 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 08:31:23 EST
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #595062.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.