Bug 598377 - request for update to 3.6
Summary: request for update to 3.6
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: bugzilla   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Emmanuel Seyman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 610275 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-01 09:09 UTC by Rakesh Pandit
Modified: 2010-07-01 23:26 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-01 12:28:11 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Rakesh Pandit 2010-06-01 09:09:29 UTC 
May you update to latest release (stable) in rawhide ?

/rakesh
Comment 1 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-06-01 12:11:29 UTC 
I've been working on this for the last week. There are still some rough edges on the .spec file but that's what rawhide is for, I guess.
Comment 2 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-06-01 12:28:11 UTC 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2221992

Coming soon to a rawhide mirror near you.
Comment 3 Michael Cronenworth 2010-06-17 15:35:20 UTC 
Would it be possible to include this into Fedora 13? AFAIK there have been no changes to the perl requirements from 3.4.x.
Comment 4 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-06-25 08:42:19 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> Would it be possible to include this into Fedora 13? AFAIK there have been no
> changes to the perl requirements from 3.4.x.

Now that 3.6.1, this is feasible, at least. It will require a lot of testing and it will likely be irreversible (unless there are no changes in the database schema, which I doubt). I don't have the time to do this, personally.

FYI, 3.4.7 is being pushed out as an update.
Comment 5 Rakesh Pandit 2010-06-25 09:15:48 UTC 
I don't endorse to do it on stable version i.e 3.6 to stable.
Comment 6 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-07-01 23:26:08 UTC 
*** Bug 610275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.