Bug 598377 – request for update to 3.6

Bug 598377 - request for update to 3.6

Summary:	request for update to 3.6

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	bugzilla (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Emmanuel Seyman
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates:	610275 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-06-01 05:09 EDT by Rakesh Pandit
Modified:	2010-07-01 19:26 EDT (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-06-01 08:28:11 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Rakesh Pandit 2010-06-01 05:09:29 EDT

May you update to latest release (stable) in rawhide ?

/rakesh

Comment 1 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-06-01 08:11:29 EDT

I've been working on this for the last week. There are still some rough edges on the .spec file but that's what rawhide is for, I guess.

Comment 2 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-06-01 08:28:11 EDT

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2221992

Coming soon to a rawhide mirror near you.

Comment 3 Michael Cronenworth 2010-06-17 11:35:20 EDT

Would it be possible to include this into Fedora 13? AFAIK there have been no changes to the perl requirements from 3.4.x.

Comment 4 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-06-25 04:42:19 EDT

(In reply to comment #3)
>
> Would it be possible to include this into Fedora 13? AFAIK there have been no
> changes to the perl requirements from 3.4.x.

Now that 3.6.1, this is feasible, at least. It will require a lot of testing and it will likely be irreversible (unless there are no changes in the database schema, which I doubt). I don't have the time to do this, personally.

FYI, 3.4.7 is being pushed out as an update.

Comment 5 Rakesh Pandit 2010-06-25 05:15:48 EDT

I don't endorse to do it on stable version i.e 3.6 to stable.

Comment 6 Emmanuel Seyman 2010-07-01 19:26:08 EDT

*** Bug 610275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.