Bug 603628 - Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers
Summary: Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the productio...
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pravin Satpute
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Keywords: i18n
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-06-14 08:24 UTC by Parag Nemade
Modified: 2010-07-22 10:52 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-07-22 10:52:15 UTC
psatpute: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Parag Nemade 2010-06-14 08:24:16 UTC
Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts-0-0.2.20100523.fc13.src.rpm
A latin font for a quality typeface for the production of books and
papers, particularly technical ones.

Comment 2 Pravin Satpute 2010-06-25 06:15:26 UTC
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i686).
koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2271467
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
not required from f13
aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided crimson-text-fonts
ok, since changes happened in devel only

+ source files match upstream url
4fde45b7b447e558da9585826734cd7b  crimson_text_100608.zip

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
-  package installed properly.

	a) Crimson Text Roman (Book, Semibold, Bold)
	b) Crimson Text Italic (Book, Semibold, Bold) 
are the two these are 2 families

but when we install it show in font selection 
Crimson Text - Italit

so user cant recognize, which one is roman and which one italic family

suggestion: use family name 1) Crimson Text Roman and 2) Crimson Text Italic in .sfd file

2) It will be good to make two subpackages 
	a) will be aldusleaf-crimson-text-roman-fonts
	a) will be aldusleaf-crimson-text-italic-fonts
it will give birth to common package as well, as per fonts spec guideline

+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content. // ask this
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ fonts scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

Comment 4 Pravin Satpute 2010-07-20 06:00:10 UTC
1) It will be nice if you can build otf from sources, see lohit-devanagari for reference

2) Roman is not looks like style, might be upstream is trying to convey some different thing

Roman might be Family or Sub-Family
Do talk this with upstream, or may be i can report bug for this afterword

no more problem

+ Package is installing properly now

Comment 6 Parag Nemade 2010-07-20 06:48:31 UTC
Thanks for the review!

New Package CVS Request
Package Name: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts
Short Description:  A latin font for the production of technical books and papers 
Owners: pnemade
InitialCC: i18n-team fonts-sig

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-21 05:15:58 UTC
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

Comment 8 Parag Nemade 2010-07-22 10:52:15 UTC
Built in rawhide.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.