Bug 605813 - [abrt] crash in gvfs-1.6.2-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gvfs-1.6.2-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 595906
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a01d1dcabb48a7337e4205c595e...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-18 20:32 UTC by Cassius Smith
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:49 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 17:16:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (9.97 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-18 20:32 UTC, Cassius Smith
no flags Details

Description Cassius Smith 2010-06-18 20:32:33 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp --spawner :1.7 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/3
comment: After transferring file from ftp server to desktop, I closed the window and tried to unmount the ftp server volume. Boom.
component: gvfs
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp
global_uuid: a01d1dcabb48a7337e4205c595e8aebf3deea1dc
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686.PAE
package: gvfs-1.6.2-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Log in to remote ftp server (with password)
2. Copy file from ftp server to desktop and close window
3. Dismount ftp server via right-click
4. Boom

Comment 1 Cassius Smith 2010-06-18 20:32:34 UTC
Created attachment 425249 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 17:16:44 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 595906 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 17:16:44 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #595906.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.