Bug 606315 - fence_apc fails for some port numbers
fence_apc fails for some port numbers
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: cman (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Marek Grac
Cluster QE
Depends On: 606297 606316
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-06-21 08:05 EDT by Marek Grac
Modified: 2011-01-13 17:34 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: cman-2.0.115-40.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 606297
Last Closed: 2011-01-13 17:34:56 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Marek Grac 2010-06-21 08:05:08 EDT
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #606297 +++

Description of problem:

This command works
fence_apc  -l user -p user -a pdu -o reboot -n 1
but the same command fails for port 23:
fence_apc  -l user -p user -a pdu -o reboot -n 23

(first line on new page)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Log into BAR cluster and try to fence bar-01:-)

--- Additional comment from pm-rhel@redhat.com on 2010-06-21 07:43:21 EDT ---

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for

--- Additional comment from mgrac@redhat.com on 2010-06-21 07:45:35 EDT ---

Line splitting is not working as expected when 'next line' is not issued and just carriage is returned on the first position. This affects only line after
'press enter to continue'

show_re = re.compile('^\s*(\d+)- (.*?)\s+(ON|OFF)\s*')

need to be changed to: (accept 0D as start of line)

show_re = re.compile('[^\x0D]\s*(\d+)- (.*?)\s+(ON|OFF)\s*')
Comment 2 Jaroslav Kortus 2010-11-22 13:01:23 EST
The actual regex is re.compile('(^|\x0D)\s*(\d+)- (.*?)\s+(ON|OFF)\s*').
As it also passed the fencing tests I'm marking it as verified.
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 17:34:56 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.