Bug 607567 - vncserver does not accept Xvnc switch
Summary: vncserver does not accept Xvnc switch
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vnc
Version: 5.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Tkac
QA Contact: Martin Cermak
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 494750
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-24 11:44 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2017-02-24 11:06 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The VNC Server script didn't accept +option switches when specified before [:X] display number.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-27 08:24:34 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
RHTS test run log for unpatched package (2.40 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-07-15 06:42 UTC, Martin Cermak 		no flags Details
RHTS test run log for patched package (2.38 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-07-15 06:43 UTC, Martin Cermak 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2010:0563 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE vnc bug fix update 2010-07-27 08:24:28 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-06-24 11:44:24 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #494750 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.5 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 6 Florian Nadge 2010-07-14 10:06:23 UTC 
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.

New Contents:
The VNC Server script didn't accept +option switches when specified before [:X] display number.
Comment 7 Martin Cermak 2010-07-15 06:42:31 UTC 
Created attachment 431981 [details]
RHTS test run log for unpatched package
Comment 8 Martin Cermak 2010-07-15 06:43:05 UTC 
Created attachment 431982 [details]
RHTS test run log for patched package
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2010-07-27 08:24:34 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0563.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.