Bug 61053 - Installation failed on 72GB drive
Installation failed on 72GB drive
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
7.3
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Michael Fulbright
Brock Organ
:
: 61051 61444 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 61590
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-03-12 13:09 EST by Issue Tracker
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:40 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-03-26 20:23:35 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Issue Tracker 2002-03-12 13:09:06 EST
Description of Problem:
Server  : DL360 G2 
Memory : 256MB 
ROM    : 12/20/2001 
OS       : RedHat 8.0 Beta1 
Boot ctlr : Integrated Smart Array 5i ctlr 
RAID 0 : 72GB Wide ultra 3 scsi drive 

Installation failed with the following message. 

"An error occurred trying to initialize swap on device cciss/c0d0p3. this
problem is serious, and the install cannot continue. Press enter to reboot your
system" 

Selected "auto partition" during installation. 
/dev/cciss/c0d0p1  52MB  /boot 
/dev/cciss/c0d0p2  68GB  / 
/dev/cciss/c0d0p3  510MB  swap. 

Installation completed successfully with 9GB drive on this server.
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2002-03-13 14:37:38 EST
Is this with Hampton beta 1 or beta 2?  Unless it's with beta 2 or reproduced
with beta 2, this is extremely low priority right now.
Comment 2 Issue Tracker 2002-03-15 15:18:03 EST
It is on both beta1 and beta2.
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2002-03-18 14:46:16 EST
If you look at tty4 when its formatting, has the partition table been reread?
Comment 4 Matt Wilson 2002-03-21 10:59:44 EST
*** Bug 61051 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Matt Wilson 2002-03-21 11:00:17 EST
*** Bug 61444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Matt Wilson 2002-03-21 11:17:45 EST
Note: please file 1 bug per issue per release.
Comment 7 Michael Fulbright 2002-03-21 12:02:54 EST
Putting in NEEDINFO state.
Comment 8 Michael Fulbright 2002-03-25 16:18:16 EST
Have you seen this problem with beta 3?
Comment 9 Jeremy Katz 2002-04-10 01:09:48 EDT
Closing due to inactivity and successful installs on 72gig+ drives

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.