Bug 611527 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 608517
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus (Show other bugs)
i686 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tomáš Bžatek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-07-05 08:56 EDT by Robert Hoekstra
Modified: 2015-03-03 17:50 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 10:14:30 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (28.99 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-05 08:57 EDT, Robert Hoekstra
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Robert Hoekstra 2010-07-05 08:56:59 EDT
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
comment: Not sure if this is easily reproduced, but I tried to extensively describe my actions when this occurred.
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_window_get_active_slot
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: b59078fbf6aa6a0347a73b6411af65cbca7b915c
package: nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
Unsure if it is reproducible, but here's what I did:
1. Started nautilus
2. opened second pane (f3)
3. opened SD storage card
4. Copied 7z file to sd card
5. Tried to unzip 7z file while no rpm was installed -> let it install on-the-fly
6. after unzipping: tried to 'eject' sd card, clicking on the eject icon
7. crash occurred.
Comment 1 Robert Hoekstra 2010-07-05 08:57:02 EDT
Created attachment 429530 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 10:14:30 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 608517 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 10:14:30 EST
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #608517.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.