Bug 614148 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13: icaltimezone_ensure_coverage: Process /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13: icaltimezone_ensure_cove...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 614081
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7d565f8e03b1ea719d9e8c29a7c...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-13 18:40 UTC by Jamin
Modified: 2010-11-09 14:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 14:08:24 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (28.52 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-13 18:40 UTC, Jamin
no flags Details


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 614081 None None None Never

Description Jamin 2010-07-13 18:40:39 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: icaltimezone_ensure_coverage
executable: /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory
global_uuid: 7d565f8e03b1ea719d9e8c29a7cb66632d1a673e
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

comment
-----
Groupwise 8 Calendar/Email Service.

This time I moved a scheduled appointment (drag and drop) from today to tomorrow. This caused a segfault.

Here is my earlier submission:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614081

How to reproduce
-----
Unknown if this can be consistently reproducable, but appears to segfualt when drag and droping, or modifying a appointment somehow via the mouse.

Comment 1 Jamin 2010-07-13 18:40:41 UTC
Created attachment 431549 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:08:24 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 614081 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:08:24 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #614081.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.