RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 617425 - RHN warning text on firstboot points to incorrect menu items
Summary: RHN warning text on firstboot points to incorrect menu items
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhn-client-tools
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Milan Zázrivec
QA Contact: Šimon Lukašík
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-23 02:15 UTC by Scott Radvan
Modified: 2015-04-07 03:19 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rhn-client-tools-1.0.0-30.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-09-23 21:55:18 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
rhn registration warning (120.07 KB, image/png)
2010-07-23 02:15 UTC, Scott Radvan
no flags Details
actual menu items (363.27 KB, image/png)
2010-07-23 02:16 UTC, Scott Radvan
no flags Details

Description Scott Radvan 2010-07-23 02:15:15 UTC
Created attachment 433857 [details]
rhn registration warning

Description of problem:

As seen in attached [rhn_warning.png], on first boot with no active network (and perhaps in other situations, ie. if you simply decline to register at this point), you are directed to the software update tool to register with RHN later, with this text:

"You may access this registration tool by running Software Updater in the Applications > System Tools menu."

(note also, it's actually called 'Software Update', not 'Software Updater' as shown in this attachment.)

Also, as seen in the attached [menu.png], not only is the Software Updater (sic) *not* in the Applications > System Tools menu as directed (rather it is actually in System > Administration), running it alone does not appear to register you; one has to run the 'RHN Register' app first, also found in System > Administration.

I believe these instructions should be reviewed for accuracy.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

6.0 Beta 2 Refresh - Server x86 

How reproducible:

Install the refresh and compare text to actual menu entries.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Reboot after installing.
2. Read RHN registration/update instructions.
3. Compare to actual menu entries on desktop.
  
Actual results:

Pointed to wrong menu (and incorrectly spelled item). Running System Update doesn't seem to register you, rather you need to run RHN Register first.

Expected results:

Correct name for Software Update tool, correct menu locations, and link to correct menu entry required for RHN registration.

Comment 1 Scott Radvan 2010-07-23 02:16:07 UTC
Created attachment 433858 [details]
actual menu items

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2010-07-23 02:37:40 UTC
This issue has been proposed when we are only considering blocker
issues in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.

** If you would still like this issue considered for the current
release, ask your support representative to file as a blocker on
your behalf. Otherwise ask that it be considered for the next
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. **

Comment 5 Milan Zázrivec 2010-07-26 12:14:51 UTC
New text reads:

"""
To keep your system updated, secure, and supported, please register this system at your earliest convenience.

You may access RHN registration tool by running RHN Registration in
the System > Administration menu.
You may access software update tool by running Software Update in
the System > Administration menu.
"""

spacewalk.git master: 6ea5357a31e6a9a37274c48aa870fe1a32509b38
satellite.git CLIENT-RHEL-6: 821c922f778fff6fa9a448dceb9435722fc8b4d3

Comment 6 Scott Radvan 2010-07-26 22:23:52 UTC
I think there should be some extra "the"s:

You may access the RHN registration tool by running RHN Registration...

and

You may access the software update tool by running Software Update...

Comment 7 Milan Zázrivec 2010-07-27 08:39:32 UTC
Added the missing 'the's:

spacewalk.git master: f9ea0110a7d54c4f0a26e4bbee94014187b89b62
satellite.git CLIENT-RHEL-6: 9794f445e62d4d2cc8154f3c9bc83326ffd5ee5f

Comment 8 Scott Radvan 2010-07-27 20:15:41 UTC
Looks good to me, thanks.

Comment 10 Šimon Lukašík 2010-08-13 06:39:46 UTC
Taking QA contact.

Comment 11 Šimon Lukašík 2010-08-13 09:53:46 UTC
Changing to VERIFIED:

Testing procedure:
- Registration to hosted with blocked network
- Registration to sat with wrong SSL certificate
- With both: firstboot & rhn_register gui

Verified against:
rhn-client-tools-1.0.0-36.el6.noarch
on RHEL6.0-20100811.2_nfs-Server-i386
and RHEL6.0-20100811.2_nfs-Server-x86_64

Comment 12 Šimon Lukašík 2010-08-13 09:57:15 UTC
Forget to add: Displayed text message was correct. Same as in comment 5.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.