RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 618140 - rpmlint issues on rpm
Summary: rpmlint issues on rpm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: icu4j
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Chris Aniszczyk
QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-26 09:09 UTC by Jan Hutař
Modified: 2010-12-01 21:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-01 21:04:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jan Hutař 2010-07-26 09:09:23 UTC
Description of problem:
rpmlint reports some issues on icu4j "binary" package.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
icu4j-4.0.1-3.3.el6.i686
rpmlint-0.94-2.el6.noarch


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. # rpmlint icu4j-4.0.1-3.3.el6.i686.rpm


Actual results:
# rpmlint icu4j-4.0.1-3.3.el6.i686.rpm
icu4j.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
icu4j.i686: E: no-binary
icu4j.i686: E: unknown-key (MD5
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.


Expected results:
No errors or warnings should be there.

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2010-07-26 12:35:08 UTC
> icu4j.i686: E: no-binary

False positive due to it being an arch-specific package but having only noarch content.  This is due to needing to have the files in %{_libdir} because of timestamp differences in javadocs that cause multilib conflicts.

Comment 2 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-12-01 20:56:56 UTC
> icu4j.i686: E: unknown-key (MD5

Rpmliint gives this error for using unknown key for signing the rpm:
'''The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option for more information.'''
I guess that this is caused by some temporary brew problem when icu4j was build.

Additionally there is planned rebase for icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656342 so this error should be gone with the next rebuild.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.