Bug 61936 - Shouldn't redhat-lsb be included by default?
Summary: Shouldn't redhat-lsb be included by default?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: distribution
Version: skipjack-beta1
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 61590
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-03-26 02:06 UTC by Chris Adams
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-03-26 20:01:42 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Adams 2002-03-26 02:06:26 UTC 
To insure LSB compatibility, shouldn't the redhat-lsb package be included in the
comps file for most (or all) default configs?  It isn't much good if nobody
installs it. :-)
Comment 1 Chris Adams 2002-03-26 15:19:01 UTC 
You've changed the component to "bind" - is there a reason?  I don't see how
that relates to this.  This should either be under redhat-lsb or maybe anaconda.
Comment 2 Matt Wilson 2002-03-26 16:16:40 UTC 
The bugzilla component for 'comps' went away.  This goes to 'distribution'
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-09 18:26:19 UTC 
At this point, I'd say we should leave it as separate for those who want LSB apps.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.