Bug 621089 - FTBFS: perl-Test-Memory-Cycle-1.04-7.1.el6
FTBFS: perl-Test-Memory-Cycle-1.04-7.1.el6
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: perl-Test-Memory-Cycle (Show other bugs)
6.0
All Linux
low Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Marcela Mašláňová
Adam Kolář
: EasyFix
: 661803 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-08-04 04:36 EDT by Paul Howarth
Modified: 2014-03-03 19:28 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: One build requires is missing. Consequence: Package can't be rebuild. Fix: Build require was added. Result: package can be rebuild.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-23 06:09:35 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Paul Howarth 2010-08-04 04:36:44 EDT
perl-Test-Memory-Cycle-1.04-7.1.el6 fails to build from source in Beta 2 (refreshed) due to the splitting off of perl-CGI from the main perl package.

Adding a buildreq of perl(CGI) resolves the problem, allowing the test suite to pass.
Comment 2 Petr Pisar 2010-12-09 12:33:31 EST
*** Bug 661803 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Suzanne Yeghiayan 2011-02-15 16:41:32 EST
This issue was proposed for RHEL 6.1 FasTrack but did not get resolved in time.
It has been moved to RHEL 6.2 FasTrack.
Comment 5 Suzanne Yeghiayan 2011-02-15 17:04:59 EST
This issue was proposed for RHEL 6.1 FasTrack but did not get resolved in time.
It has been moved to RHEL 6.2 FasTrack.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2013-05-23 06:09:35 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0859.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.