Bug 621581 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13: magazine_chain_pop_head:...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 595963
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:62c39653ba03557921bcc60ddbf...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-05 14:45 UTC by Dan Scott
Modified: 2010-11-08 18:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 18:16:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (41.92 KB, text/plain)
2010-08-05 14:46 UTC, Dan Scott 		no flags Details
View All

Description Dan Scott 2010-08-05 14:45:58 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head
executable: /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
global_uuid: 62c39653ba03557921bcc60ddbfac92133b32e07
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Clicked "New" in Evolution to write a new email
2. Clicked "To" in the new email dialogue to bring up the address book, which defaults to a Google-based address book
3. Crash.
Comment 1 Dan Scott 2010-08-05 14:46:00 UTC 
Created attachment 436867 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:16:37 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 595963 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:16:37 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #595963.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.