RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 624162 - sos report should also include /etc/sssd/sssd.conf
Summary: sos report should also include /etc/sssd/sssd.conf
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sos
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Stokes
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 713228 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 653474
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-13 21:37 UTC by Nalin Dahyabhai
Modified: 2012-04-23 13:03 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sos-2.2-3.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
With this update, sos includes the /etc/sssd/sssd.conf configuration file in its reports if the sssd package is installed and configured in the system.
Clone Of:
: 653474 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:27:40 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0773 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sos bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-18 18:08:30 UTC

Description Nalin Dahyabhai 2010-08-13 21:37:09 UTC
Description of problem:
The sos report from bug #623694 indicates that the client system is configured to use sssd, but does not include the sssd.conf configuration file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Based on the install.log, I'm guessing sos-2.1-0.el6.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run sosreport
2. List the contents of the generated archive

Comment 1 Pierre Carrier 2010-11-23 10:23:05 UTC
Committed upstream.
https://fedorahosted.org/sos/browser/trunk/sos/plugins/sssd.py?rev=995

Comment 9 Tomas Capek 2011-05-18 14:48:01 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
With this update, sos includes the /etc/sssd/sssd.conf configuration file in its reports if the sssd package is installed and configured in the system.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:27:40 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0773.html

Comment 11 Bryn M. Reeves 2011-06-15 15:48:04 UTC
*** Bug 713228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.