Bug 634174 - [abrt] totem-2.30.2-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/totem was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] totem-2.30.2-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/totem was killed by signa...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 600657
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: totem
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bastien Nocera
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1cddb8a433cf0b1a0825617b20d...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-15 12:34 UTC by Yasser Yekken
Modified: 2010-11-08 19:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 19:22:35 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (45.89 KB, text/plain)
2010-09-15 12:36 UTC, Yasser Yekken 		no flags Details
View All

Description Yasser Yekken 2010-09-15 12:34:24 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: totem '/home/yass3r/Bureau/MP3/ISLAMIC/\xd8\xa7\xd9\x83\xd8\xa8\xd8\xb1 \xd9\x85\xd8\xac\xd9\x85\xd9\x88\xd8\xb9\xd8\xa9 \xd9\x85\xd8\xaf\xd8\xa7\xd8\xa6\xd8\xad \xd9\x86\xd8\xa8\xd9\x88\xd9\x8a\xd8\xa9 \xd9\x88\xd8\xb1\xd9\x88\xd8\xad\xd8\xa7\xd9\x86\xd9\x8a\xd8\xa7\xd8\xaa \xd9\x84\xd8\xa7\xd8\xb1\xd9\x88\xd8\xb9 \xd8\xa7\xd9\x84\xd9\x85\xd9\x86\xd8\xb4\xd8\xaf\xd9\x8a\xd9\x86/01\xd9\x85\xd8\xad\xd9\x85\xd8\xaf \xd9\x8a\xd8\xa7\xd8\xad\xd8\xa8\xd9\x8a\xd8\xa8\xd9\x8a \xd8\xa3\xd8\xa8\xd9\x88\xd8\xb4\xd8\xb9\xd8\xb1.mp3'
component: totem
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/totem
kernel: 2.6.34.6-47.fc13.i686.PAE
package: totem-2.30.2-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/totem was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1284483496
uid: 500
Comment 1 Yasser Yekken 2010-09-15 12:36:03 UTC 
Created an attachment (id=447455)
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:22:35 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 600657 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:22:35 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #600657.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.