Bug 63613 - Some packages in beta2 are older than in beta1
Some packages in beta2 are older than in beta1
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: distribution (Show other bugs)
skipjack-beta2
i386 Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Jay Turner
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-04-16 05:37 EDT by Richard Smith
Modified: 2015-01-07 18:56 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-16 05:37:51 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Richard Smith 2002-04-16 05:37:46 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-12 i686)

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Compare the package lists...
2.
3.
	

Additional info:

Not sure if this is really a bug, but I couldn't find any information in the
readme / release notes giving a reason.

Package                  Beta1 version               Beta2 version

Older in Beta2:
 screen                          3.9.11-1              3.9.10-1             
 sendmail                        8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            
 sendmail-cf                     8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            
 sendmail-devel                  8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            
 sendmail-doc                    8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            

Missing in Beta2:
 squid-config                    0.5-2                 -                    

Possibly missing in beta2:
 bash-completion                 2.05a-9               -                    
 kpm                             3.0.0-0.cvs20020307.1 -                    

Possibly older in beta2:
 koffice                         2.0.0-0.cvs20020307.1 1.1.1-4              
 koffice-devel                   -                     1.1.1-4
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-16 17:17:07 EDT
All intentional.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.