Bug 63613 - Some packages in beta2 are older than in beta1
Summary: Some packages in beta2 are older than in beta1
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: distribution
Version: skipjack-beta2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: Jay Turner
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-04-16 09:37 UTC by Richard Smith
Modified: 2015-01-07 23:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-16 09:37:51 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Richard Smith 2002-04-16 09:37:46 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-12 i686)

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Compare the package lists...
2.
3.
	

Additional info:

Not sure if this is really a bug, but I couldn't find any information in the
readme / release notes giving a reason.

Package                  Beta1 version               Beta2 version

Older in Beta2:
 screen                          3.9.11-1              3.9.10-1             
 sendmail                        8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            
 sendmail-cf                     8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            
 sendmail-devel                  8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            
 sendmail-doc                    8.12.2-8              8.11.6-14            

Missing in Beta2:
 squid-config                    0.5-2                 -                    

Possibly missing in beta2:
 bash-completion                 2.05a-9               -                    
 kpm                             3.0.0-0.cvs20020307.1 -                    

Possibly older in beta2:
 koffice                         2.0.0-0.cvs20020307.1 1.1.1-4              
 koffice-devel                   -                     1.1.1-4
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-16 21:17:07 UTC 
All intentional.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.