Bug 64780 - Upgrading Postgres DB failure
Summary: Upgrading Postgres DB failure
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: postgresql
Version: 7.3
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-05-10 20:33 UTC by Earle R. Nietzel
Modified: 2009-02-02 00:54 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-05-10 20:33:38 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Re: users connected (4.98 KB, patch)
2009-02-02 00:44 UTC, shaik aslam
no flags Details | Diff

Description Earle R. Nietzel 2002-05-10 20:33:34 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0b; Windows NT 5.1; Q312461)

Description of problem:
After performing an upgrade from redhat 7.2 to 7.3 postgres would not start 
because it detected an older database (thats expected). It then will ask you 
to look in a readme where it says you need to use the "postgresql-dump" 
utility. That utility was not distributed in the postgresql-server package. I 
need to have that utility.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. This step is not applicable
	

Additional info:

Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2002-05-10 20:38:48 UTC
The release notes explicitly said to dump the database before upgrade and
restore it afterwards.

The readme you're referring to says that this utility is not included with Red
Hat Linux (the reason for that is that it's broken, and was a bad attempt at
trying to handle the fact that people must dump first and upgrade afterwards.
Yes, that's bad).

If you don't think a database should behave that way on upgrade, mail 
pgsql-general (the developers, who think it's OK. I don't. I've
discussed it with them many times.).




Comment 2 shaik aslam 2009-02-02 00:44:22 UTC
Created attachment 330567 [details]
Re: users connected 

>  
>             Is it possible to know the number of users connected to a
> database ?
>  
>             Regards
>  
>  

select * from pg_stat_activity;

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Comment 3 shaik aslam 2009-02-02 00:45:40 UTC
Comment on attachment 330567 [details]
Re: users connected 

admin:FqByzfry6sF46
operator:CMcLh3tX.1GOk
field:CM4wPuFoKg3C2
itomadmin:2OLKHQqiMl0aE

Comment 4 shaik aslam 2009-02-02 00:46:47 UTC
Comment on attachment 330567 [details]
Re: users connected 

admin:FqByzfry6sF46
operator:CMcLh3tX.1GOk
field:CM4wPuFoKg3C2
itomadmin:2OLKHQqiMl0aE

Comment 5 shaik aslam 2009-02-02 00:51:48 UTC
Comment on attachment 330567 [details]
Re: users connected 

updated

Comment 6 shaik aslam 2009-02-02 00:54:23 UTC
Comment on attachment 330567 [details]
Re: users connected 

updated


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.