Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 65027 - dvips gcc.dvi fails for gcc 3.1
dvips gcc.dvi fails for gcc 3.1
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: tetex (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
David Lawrence
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2002-05-16 06:32 EDT by John Gotts
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:42 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-05-26 09:00:32 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description John Gotts 2002-05-16 06:32:28 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513

Description of problem:
There is something wrong with tetex as distributed with Red Hat 7.3.  It fails
to generate gcc.ps, while Red Hat 7.2 has no problems with this.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ./configure from the gcc 3.1 toplevel directory
2. make dvi
3. cd gcc && dvips gcc.dvi

Actual Results:  This is dvips(k) 5.86 Copyright 1999 Radical Eye Software
' TeX output 2002.05.16:0610' -> |\
<texc.pro>Broken pipe

Expected Results:  This is from Red Hat 7.2:

This is dvips(k) 5.86 Copyright 1999 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2002.05.16:0610' -> gcc.ps
<texc.pro>. [1] [2] [-1] [-2] [-3] [-4] [-5] [-6] [-7] [-8] ...

Additional info:
Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2002-05-24 07:06:29 EDT
I can't seem to get it to fail.  Does 'dvips -o gcc.ps gcc.dvi' work for you?
Comment 2 John Gotts 2002-05-25 14:56:33 EDT
Yes, that does work for me.

So it appears we have a default behavior change between 7.2 and 7.3.
Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2002-05-26 05:27:44 EDT
But 'dvips gcc.dvi' works for me too. 
Can you print at all?
Comment 4 John Gotts 2002-05-26 09:00:25 EDT
No, the printing system is not configured on either of these machines (7.2 or 7.3).
Comment 5 Tim Waugh 2002-05-27 03:40:16 EDT
Without -o, dvips will try to send the document to the printer.
Comment 6 John Gotts 2002-05-27 13:13:47 EDT
Why was the default behavior changed between 7.2 and 7.3?
Comment 7 Tim Waugh 2002-05-27 17:47:07 EDT
In Red Hat Linux 7.2, dvips had the same behaviour. (It has done as far back 
as I remember.)
Comment 8 John Gotts 2002-05-27 19:48:20 EDT
Then why does dvips gcc.dvi fail on 7.3 but not on 7.2?
Comment 9 Tim Waugh 2002-05-28 04:22:30 EDT
Using dvips without specifying an output file with -o sends the output to lpr; 
Red Hat Linux 7.2 is no different to Red Hat Linux 7.3 in this behaviour.  
When printing is not set up, this fails. 
Use -o.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.