From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; NetCaptor 6.5.0PB8) Description of problem: In the given testcase, for operator "template <class T> C::operator T ()" with T = {int}, g++3 compiler produces the following mangled name: _ZN1CcviIiEEv but it's expected to have mangled name "_ZN1CcvT_IiEEv" here. --- testcase (fail.cpp) ------------------------------------- struct C { template <class T> operator T (); }; template <class T> C::operator T () { return 0; } template C::operator int (); Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. compile testcase g++3 -c fail.cpp 2. get list of produced mangled names in the object file nm fail.o | grep _Z 3. You will see **** T _ZN1CcviIiEEv Which is wrong. Additional info:
Your expected mangling is not even accepted by c++filt as valid. Can you please explain why do you think it is mangled improperly?
1. Clarify the issue Unfortunately, the mangling grammer given in the ABI is ambiguous in this area, so we need to think more about it. First of all, let's decompose the mangled name taking GCC's encoding (it does not matter which one to take). We are interesting in the following parts of '_ZN1CcviIiEEv' mangled name: a) cvi # <operator-name> ::= cv <type> b) IiE # <template-args> ::= I <type>+ E In both parts, value of <type> used to be the same. And it is really the same 8- ). But, only one question is there: Which part should be encoded/decoded first? (the hen or the egg) As I can see, part a) depends on type value of b). So the <type> in the a should be a reference to template argument from b. 2. Clarify compiler behaviour Let's change our example to make the behaviour more clean and see what exactly compilers are doing. According to the ABI, built-in types are not substituted, so it's better to change built-in type 'int' to some class 'A'. Now we that g++3 encodes operator as: _ZN1Ccv1AIS0_EEv i.e. type 1A in the part (a) of mangled name becomes major one, and part (b) reference it by <substitution> While the correct code is: _ZN1CcvT_I1AEEv where part (a) depends from type specified in part (b) so it reference it as <template-param>. 3. Decoder Yes, c++filt is not able to decode given names. But decoder is not guilty. The root of the problem is the mangling grammer.
Correct result produced by 8.0 g++ 3.2