Bug 666286 - Please branch gnupg from Fedora Rawhide for EPEL 6
Summary: Please branch gnupg from Fedora Rawhide for EPEL 6
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnupg
Version: 19
Hardware: All
OS: All
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brian Lane
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-12-30 01:13 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2013-12-18 23:15 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-18 23:15:08 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2010-12-30 01:13:01 UTC
Description of problem:
Please branch gnupg from Fedora Rawhide for EPEL 6. I'm explicitly talking
about gnupg, not gnupg2 here, as my perl-Crypt-GPG requires gnupg 1.x, not
gnupg 2.x.

Of course we will have to ask Red Hat to remove their pseudo compatibility
stuff from the gnupg2.spec file in RHEL 6, so that users can install both,
gnupg and gnupg2. But for users just needing gnupg and no gnupg2, a branch
and a build of gnupg at EPEL 6 should/would be enough.

I know, gnupg2 obsoletes gnupg <= 1.4.10, but there is gnupg 1.4.11 and if
a package has a requires gnupg < 2.0, that should add a dependency to gnupg
for now (which may forces the user to remove gnupg2 until Red Hat removed
their pseudo compatibility stuff/links etc.).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnupg-1.4.11-2.fc15

Actual results:
No gnupg package in EPEL 6.

Expected results:
Package gnupg in EPEL 6.

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
there.

Comment 1 Remi Collet 2012-01-28 09:39:15 UTC
I also need gnupg 1 in EPEL-6 (working on php-pecl-gnupg)

Comment 2 Brian Lane 2012-01-30 16:42:47 UTC
I don't think it is possible to change gnupg2 for RHEL. They prefer minimal changes and EPEL is an add on repository, not part of the official RHEL release so a change like that wouldn't make sense.

Comment 3 advax 2012-10-07 23:43:34 UTC
There's a long thread about this in Gentoo at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-639272.html

I just built gnupg 1.4.12 as an RPM which works OK though I get conflicts with gnupg-2 as RedHat put a symlink for /usr/bin/gpg and some docs conflict. Fixable by renaming gpg to gpg1. My specfile is not professional quality :-7 - copied from RHEL 5. But I would think it was possible to put that in EPEL.

I find the GUI behaviour in gnupg-2 annoying too, though it seems I can defeat that by saying DISPLAY="". I also thought it failed totally when I ssh'd in from my N810 tablet, though of course when I check now ncurses works.

Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2013-04-03 18:28:27 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle.
Changing version to '19'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.