Description: This is another framework for writing test scripts. It is loosely
inspired by Test::More, and has most of it's functionality, but it is
not a drop-in replacement.Test::More (and other existing test
frameworks) suffer from two weaknesses, both of which have prevented me
from ever using them: None offer the ability to access specific tests in
a reasonably interactive fashion
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
(but needs a space after the period in 3rd line)
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
GPL+ or Artistic
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text included.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
perl(Test::Inter) = 1.01
perl-Test-Inter = 1.01-1.fc15
perl >= 0:5.004
+ %check is present and all tests pass.
+ ./Build test
t/file.t .......... ok
t/is.t ............ ok
t/ok.t ............ ok
t/pod.t ........... ok
t/pod_coverage.t .. ok
t/require_ok.t .... ok
t/skip_all.t ...... skipped: testing skip_all
t/tests.t ......... ok
t/use_ok.1.t ...... ok
t/use_ok.2.t ...... ok
t/use_ok.3.t ...... ok
All tests successful.
Files=11, Tests=60, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.02 sys + 0.34 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.45 CPU)
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
There's a space missing after the period in 3rd line of %description. And the explicit Requires for perl(File::Basename) and perl(IO::File) are unnecessary - both are detected automatically.
Thank, I'll fix it.
New Package SCM Request
Package Name: perl-Test-Inter
Short Description: Framework for more readable interactive test scripts
Owners: mmaslano psabata ppisar
I guess this package was formerly orphaned/retired?
Then you should use a "Package Change Request".
You don't want an f14 branch?
That still doesn't explain:
Hm, looks like this is duplicate of 633879. Sorry for useless review :(
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 633879 ***