Hide Forgot
Created attachment 473551 [details] stap output Description of problem: # stap -v -p4 /usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/buildok/syscall.stp (snipped gazillion warnings in pass 1: see attachment) Pass 2: analyzed script: 475 probe(s), 135 function(s), 20 embed(s), 11 global(s) using 126144virt/72016res/7040shr kb, in 7108usr/238sys/14109real ms. Pass 3: translated to C into "/tmp/stapmBgxQH/stap_ef362fcadce3f09ebf1be028358241bf_300758.c" using 125888virt/73376res/8512shr kb, in 583usr/35sys/618real ms. /tmp/stapmBgxQH/stap_ef362fcadce3f09ebf1be028358241bf_300758.c: In function `function__ia64_pipe1': /tmp/stapmBgxQH/stap_ef362fcadce3f09ebf1be028358241bf_300758.c:15972: warning: implicit declaration of function `task_pt_regs' /tmp/stapmBgxQH/stap_ef362fcadce3f09ebf1be028358241bf_300758.c:15972: error: invalid type argument of `->' make[1]: *** [/tmp/stapmBgxQH/stap_ef362fcadce3f09ebf1be028358241bf_300758.o] Error 1 make: *** [_module_/tmp/stapmBgxQH] Error 2 Pass 4: compiled C into "stap_ef362fcadce3f09ebf1be028358241bf_300758.ko" in 3154usr/148sys/3380real ms. Pass 4: compilation failed. Try again with another '--vp 0001' option. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): systemtap-1.3-4.el4 the testcase if present only in systemtap-testsuite-1.3-4, but systemtap-0.6.2-2.el4_8.3 (4.8) compiles the identical script, so it is a regression How reproducible: always on ia64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. stap -v -p4 /usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/buildok/syscall.stp 2. 3. Actual results: pass 4 fails Expected results: pass 4 succeeds Additional info: Not sure if this is related to bug 669085 , filing as separate for now (669085 fails in different pass and was isolated to i386 so far)
likely patch in hand (stap commit #f8f6e753)
upstream git commit 0db6b0a67e
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0229.html