671156 – gdbm-devl have to have an explicit package version requirement on gdbm

Bug 671156 - gdbm-devl have to have an explicit package version requirement on gdbm

Summary: gdbm-devl have to have an explicit package version requirement on gdbm

Keywords:
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA
Alias:	None
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	gdbm
Sub Component:
Version:	5.6
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Priority:	medium
Severity:	medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assignee:	Honza Horak
QA Contact:	qe-baseos-daemons
Docs Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+	depends on / blocked

Reported:	2011-01-20 16:04 UTC by Ales Zelinka
Modified:	2013-04-15 09:12 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-05-14 09:13:33 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Dependent Products:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)

Links
System	ID	Private	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2012:0579	0	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	gdbm bug fix update	2012-05-14 13:09:31 UTC

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-05-31 15:25:51 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the
current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this
request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support
representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant,
in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 4 Honza Horak 2012-04-27 12:57:45 UTC

Committed to git, moving to modified.
http://bulk-mail.corp.redhat.com/archives/cvs-commits-list/2012-April/msg12252.html

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-05-14 09:13:33 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0579.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.