Bug 67294 - adapt control-center and redhat-artwork to new metacity
Summary: adapt control-center and redhat-artwork to new metacity
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: control-center
Version: 1.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Owen Taylor
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 67980 68828 68829 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 67217
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-06-21 22:59 UTC by Havoc Pennington
Modified: 2007-03-27 03:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-07-29 21:08:47 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Havoc Pennington 2002-06-21 22:59:57 UTC
control-center needs a new upstream version, and we need to add:
 - metacity theme configuration
 - icon theme configuration
 - metacity font configuration

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 02:20:21 UTC
Maybe GTK 1.2 theme, but I don't have a clue how to express that sanely in a GUI
("GTK 1.2 theme" is not a reasonable string to have in a UI).
Suggest instead just automatically changing the 1.2 theme if one is found with
the same name as the 2.0 theme.

Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 02:21:07 UTC
*** Bug 68829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 02:21:29 UTC
*** Bug 68828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-15 20:22:02 UTC
*** Bug 67980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-29 16:25:32 UTC
Marking the head of the priority queue with priority high

Comment 6 Havoc Pennington 2002-07-29 21:08:42 UTC
Remaining issue here (that isn't punted - icon theme punted) 
is to build a new metacity with the themes moved, then adapt the control panel
to it. I'll build the new metacity soon.

Comment 7 Owen Taylor 2002-08-08 18:00:35 UTC
I think this is all fixed now. (Is that right, Jonathan?)

Comment 8 Jonathan Blandford 2002-08-08 18:59:08 UTC
I'm pretty sure it is.

Comment 9 Michael Fulbright 2002-12-20 17:38:25 UTC
Time tracking values updated


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.