Bug 674418 - Accessibility handles in for filter check boxes aren't accurate
Summary: Accessibility handles in for filter check boxes aren't accurate
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Justin Harris
QA Contact: J.C. Molet
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 568421
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-01 20:01 UTC by J.C. Molet
Modified: 2013-07-04 21:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:39:21 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2011:0611 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE new package: subscription-manager 2011-05-18 17:56:21 UTC

Description J.C. Molet 2011-02-01 20:01:15 UTC
Description of problem:

The accessibility names of the filters for "match my installed products" and "have no overlap with existing subscriptions" are currently "Not Installed" and "Overlap" respectively.  The names of the handlers seem to be the opposite of what the filter actually does.  This is probably due to the fact that the filters used to behave differently in previous builds.  It would be nice if these handlers were renamed as to avoid confusion.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
subscription-manager-gnome-0.94.3-1.git.10.aeee843.el6.x86_64

Comment 1 Justin Harris 2011-02-04 14:45:41 UTC
The handles are now (in order):
 * Match System
 * Match Installed
 * Do Not Overlap

Note that I changed the first check box as well (used to be "Match Hardware") to be closer to the current label.

In commit:  340aaf0f68968923baefb05c3b87a13ebc9f17c8

Comment 3 J.C. Molet 2011-02-18 16:30:07 UTC
tested as working in:

subscription-manager-gnome-0.95.1-1.git.15.c75e560.el6.x86_64

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:39:21 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0611.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.