Bug 674534 - oddjob init script returns wrong code for nonexist action
Summary: oddjob init script returns wrong code for nonexist action
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: oddjob
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Nalin Dahyabhai
QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 756953
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-02 10:57 UTC by Yulia Kopkova
Modified: 2011-11-25 09:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: oddjob-0.30-4.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 756953 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-10 07:51:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0339 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE oddjob bug fix update 2011-03-10 07:50:58 UTC

Description Yulia Kopkova 2011-02-02 10:57:57 UTC 
Description of problem:
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript oddjob 
component init script should return code "2" on nonexist action

# service oddjobd nonexist ; echo $?
Usage: /etc/init.d/oddjobd {start|stop|restart|condrestart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
1

now: 1
expected: 2
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-02-02 11:28:09 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-03-10 07:51:08 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0339.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.